On November 6th, voters will choose whether to boost or cut Social Security and Medicare. The stakes are that simple. Republicans proposals would raise eligibility ages, reduce benefits and undermine both programs. On the other side, Democrats have introduced bills to expand and protect seniors’ earned benefits – legislation which has languished in a GOP-controlled Congress.
Voters will have a clear choice between candidates who talk about ‘entitlement reform’ and those who truly champion Social Security and Medicare for current and future retirees. With five weeks until election day, the National Committee is supporting more than 60 candidates for House and Senate who share the commitment to preserving and enhancing seniors’ financial and health security. Here are a few of the candidates we are adding to our list this week:
Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) is a “strong proponent” of Social Security, according to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel and earns a 100% rating from the National Committee. Ditto for Medicare, as she co-sponsored the Medicare and Medicaid Protection Act to protect the two programs from partisan attacks through the budget reconciliation process. Her opponent, Kevin Nicholson, has proposed means testing earned benefits and “indexing” the retirement age to average life expectancy.
In Virginia’s 7th district, former CIA officer Abigail Spanberger is challenging incumbent Congressman Dave Brat. Brat is a Tea Party favorite who has been campaigning to slash seniors’ earned benefits since first running for Congress in 2014, telling CNN last year, “(We’re) going to have to do some major cuts” to Social Security and Medicare. Spanberger opposes “any attempts” to privatize either program or to cut benefits, and pledges to “protect Social Security and Medicare so we can meet our obligations to seniors, now and into the future.”
Democrat Mike Levin seeks the House seat being vacated by Republican Rep. Darrell Issa in California’s 49th district. He believes that Social Security and Medicare are “some of the most successful programs in our nation’s history” and thinks we should be “doing the opposite” of raising the retirement age. Levin pledges to strengthen – not slash – benefits. The San Diego Union-Tribune calls Levin an “easy pick” in his race against Republican politico Diane Harkey.
Maine state representative Jared Golden is running against Congressman Bruce Polquin in the state’s 2nd Congressional district. Golden has rightly called out the GOP incumbent for voting to take healthcare away from more than 100,000 Mainers, adding $2 trillion to the debt by voting for the Trump/GOP tax plan and “threatening cuts to Social Security and Medicare to pay for it.” Golden promises to fight “privatization or rollback” of either program and advocates increasing benefits “so that more seniors have the opportunity for comfortable, secure retirements.”
One can see from the Real Clear Politics statuses for these races that the outcomes are not a forgone conclusion. Only one of the candidates we support, Sen. Tammy Baldwin, has a clear lead five weeks before election day. That’s why the National Committee has been encouraging seniors and their families to vote as if Social Security and Medicare are on the line. Because this election year, they truly are.
With Americans’ earned benefits under almost constant threat from the Trump administration and its allies in Congress, the importance of November’s elections – exactly six weeks from today – could not be clearer. The very future of Social Security and Medicare is at stake. That’s why the National Committee vigorously supports more than 80 House and Senate candidates across America who champion Social Security and Medicare.
This month, National Committee representatives took the fight for Social Security and Medicare to two decidedly red areas of the country. NCPSSM President and CEO Max Richtman campaigned for House candidate Brendan Kelly in Southern Illinois, while legislative director Dan Adcock traveled to Montana in support of congressional candidate Kathleen Williams.
Both candidates are staunch defenders of earned benefits; both face Republican opponents whose positions on Social Security and Medicare are troubling. At separate endorsement events, Richtman and Adcock presented Kelly and Williams with the National Committee’s trademark red boxing gloves to signify that the candidates are fighters for America’s seniors.
Williams is challenging Republican incumbent Greg Gianforte for Montana’s lone House seat. “I will make sure that our seniors can retire with dignity by protecting Medicare and Social Security no matter what,” promised Williams, a three-term member of Montana’s state legislature and one of the more than 180 women running for Congress this year. Williams received a ringing endorsement from Dan Adcock at public forums in Livingston and Bozeman, Montana.
“Kathleen Williams appreciates that Montanans are just getting by and that they don’t have money left over from their paychecks to save for retirement. She gets that Social Security and Medicare need to be protected, particularly for the growing share of workers who will depend on their earned benefits for most of their financial and health security in retirement.” – Dan Adcock, NCPSSM Director of Government Relations and Policy
In Illinois 12th District (carried by Donald Trump in 2016 by a 15% margin), Navy veteran and former prosecutor Brendan Kelly seeks to unseat Republican Mike Bost. Bost has voted with President Trump 98% of the time, including a ‘yes’ on the Trump/GOP tax cuts. Challenger Kelly charges that Congressman Bost “handed big banks and Big Pharma a corrupt tax giveaway — threatening Medicare and Social Security.”
“We need leaders who will keep Big Pharma in check. We need leaders who will allow Medicare to negotiate prices, a move which will save seniors’ money and lives.” – Congressional candidate Brendan Kelly, Illinois 12th District
Max Richtman heartily endorsed Kelly at a packed town hall in Waterloo, Iowa:
“I wanted to come out here to make this endorsement because, as Brendan said, this is an important race… and important to the programs I care about and I believe you care about.” – Max Richtman, NCPSSM President and CEO
With the stakes so high, NCPSSM has been encouraging all eligible voters to make their voices heard at the ballot box six weeks from now. Americans must choose between candidates who simply pay lip service to Social Security and Medicare – and those who are committed to protecting – and expanding – both programs. They must scrutinize the records of incumbents who may have supported proposals to cut and privatize Social Security and Medicare. By endorsing and supporting candidates across the nation, the National Committee hopes to help voters make these crucial choices.
In case there was any doubt that the White House and many Congressional Republicans still want to cut Americans’ earned benefits, chief economic advisor Larry Kudlow just confirmed it. On Monday at the Economic Club of New York, Kudlow told CNBC’s Becky Quick that Social Security and Medicare are still very much on the table:
QUICK: Will the Trump administration tackle entitlement reform?
KUDLOW: Well, we’ve already tackled a big part of the newest entitlement, namely Obamacare. As far as the larger entitlements, I think everybody’s going to look at that probably next year. I don’t want to be specific, I don’t want to get ahead of our own budgeting, but we’ll get there.
This aligns with comments from National Republican Congressional Committee chair, Rep. Steve Stivers, House Speaker Paul Ryan, and several other key GOP members about the need to pay for last year’s tax cuts by ‘reforming’ Social Security and Medicare. ‘Reforming,’ of course, means cutting and privatizing.
“Polls consistently indicate that majorities of Americans oppose cutting earned benefits and privatization – and do not support the Trump/GOP tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations. Kudlow’s remarks are particularly ironic in light of President Trump’s recent assertion that the administration and its allies in Congress will ‘protect’ Social Security and Medicare while Democrats want to ‘destroy’ them.” – Max Richtman, National Committee President, 9/18/18
The President’s claims fly in the face of reality, of course. Just last week Democrats energized their campaign to boost benefits by launching Expand Social Security caucuses in the House and Senate. Democrats have already introduced legislation to strengthen Social Security and reduce costs for Medicare beneficiaries. Meanwhile, the Republicans’ latest budget proposals call for billions in cuts to both to Social Security and Medicare. In an article published yesterday, MSNBC producer Steve Benen laid bare the hypocrisy of President Trump’s claims.
“As election-season pitches go, the idea that Republicans will support Medicare and Social Security more than Democrats is as cynical as it is ridiculous. But while the president and some of his cohorts vow to protect these pillars of modern American life, other Republicans are stepping on the party’s message and signaling their intentions to cut those programs.” – Steve Benen, MSNBC, 9/17/18
In his comments yesterday, the president’s top economic advisor has just reinforced the political right’s true priorities: cutting benefits for seniors and disabled Americans living on fixed incomes to pay for tax cuts for the rich.
The cause of expanding Social Security got a big boost on Capitol Hill today with the creation of two new Congressional caucuses. Key members of the House and Senate launched ‘Expand Social Security’ caucuses for each chamber of Congress. Co-chaired by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Representatives John Larson (D-CT), Conor Lamb (D-PA), Debbie Dingell (D-MI), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), and Terri Sewell (D-AL), members of the new caucuses promised a “righteous fight” to expand, not cut, Social Security – while demanding the wealthiest pay their fair share. “We’ll protect and expand Social Security for every American who has a right to it,” promised Congresswoman Dingell.
Yellow t-shirted volunteers from the National Committee’s Capital Action Team (CATs) traveled to Capitol Hill to show their support for the new caucuses. Speaking for the National Committee, Senior Policy Analyst Webster Phillips lauded members of Congress for embracing a movement the group has long championed.
“For decades, stagnant wages have eroded working Americans’ ability to save for retirement. That’s why protecting and expanding Social Security is critical to the National Committee, and to an overwhelming majority of Americans from across the political spectrum.” – NCPSSM Senior Policy Analyst Webster Phillips, 9/13/18
Senator Sanders touted legislation, including his own Social Security Expansion Act and Rep. Larson’s Social Security 2100 Act, which would keep the system solvent for decades while modestly boosting benefits.
“We must say loudly and clearly, at a time when millions of seniors are trying to survive on fixed incomes, we’re not going to cut Social Security. We’re going to expand! You hear that, Paul Ryan? Expand!” – Sen. Bernie Sanders, 9/13/18
Co-chair John Larson said that more than 140 members had signed onto the House caucus so far, making it the largest in Congress. Larson and the other co-chairs insisted the time is right for creation of these caucuses, in the face of relentless Republican proposals to cut Social Security benefits, which they falsely label ‘entitlements.’ “News flash! It’s not an entitlement. It’s insurance you pay for,” thundered Larson. Senator Warren struck an equally defiant tone.
“We’re here to say no! We will never cut Social Security. We will expand Social Security! We will fight shoulder to shoulder for what’s right. This is a righteous fight… and we’re going to win!” – Sen. Elizabeth Warren, 9/13/18
In 2013, the National Committee launched the Boost Social Security Now campaign to advocate higher benefits and more accurate cost-of-living adjustments (among other improvements) for retirees and people with disabilities. “With almost half of retirees depending on Social Security for all or most of their income at a time of rising living expenses, boosting benefits is the only just and sustainable path forward,” said Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee.
The “Boost” campaign includes specific policy prescriptions for expanding the program, including: lifting the cap on Social Security payroll contributions (currently set at $128,400 in annual income); increasing the basic benefit for current and future retirees; providing Social Security credits for family caregivers; and replacing the inadequate inflation index now used to calculate cost-of-living adjustments with the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly (CPI-E), which more accurately reflects seniors’ true expenses. These expansion measures stand in stark opposition to the conservative agenda to cut Social Security.
“The movement to expand Social Security is a bulwark against conservative attempts to slash benefits, raise the retirement age, and impose lower cost-of-living adjustments under the guise of ‘entitlement reform.’ The political right has renewed its attacks on Americans’ earned benefits in the wake of the Trump/GOP tax cuts, which have failed to trickle down to working people while blowing a $2 trillion hole in the federal debt,” said Richtman.
Expanding Social Security benefits is not only the right thing to do for beneficiaries struggling to make ends meet; it will enhance Social Security’s role in boosting the economy. Social Security already provides more than $1.6 trillion in national economic stimulus every year. Every dollar paid in benefits adds $2 to the economy. Boosting Social Security benefits will infuse communities, states, and the entire country with billions of dollars in additional stimulus. For more information, see the National Committee’s Social Security Snapshots, detailing the program’s economic impact in all 50 states and U.S. territories.
If legislation passed by the Senate on Tuesday becomes law, your pharmacist may no longer be ‘gagged’ or forbidden from telling you crucial information about drug pricing. Many of us pay inflated prices for drugs by going through insurance, rather than paying out of pocket. A blood pressure medication might cost $20 on an insurance plan, where it might only cost $8 out of pocket. But, under the Medicare Part D law, many pharmacists are prohibited from sharing that information with their customers.
The Know the Lowest Price Act, sponsored by Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), prohibits insurers – and middlemen known as pharmacy benefit mangers (PBMs) – from restricting a pharmacist’s ability to provide drug price information when there is a difference between the cost of the drug under the plan and the cost of the drug without using insurance.
The bipartisan bill passed by ‘unanimous consent’ – which means that no Senators objected. Usually dependable allies of Big Pharma and insurance companies struck a blow for consumers with this common sense legislation that removes an unreasonable restriction on pharmacists and directly benefits consumers.
Senator Stabenow, ranking member on the Senate Health Care Subcommittee, has become a leader in the fight to reduce prescription drug prices. Americans pay more for prescription drugs than most other countries. The price for the most popular brand-name drugs have risen more than 200% since 2008.
“Healthcare is a basic human right and everyone should be able to afford the medications he or she needs. Drug companies treat prescription drugs as a commodity to be priced at whatever the market will bear, even if patients can’t afford critical life-saving medicine.” – Senator Debbie Stabenow
Meanwhile, the median salary of a pharmaceutical CEO is roughly $15 million per year. In the wake of the Trump/GOP tax scam, large pharmaceutical companies have spent $50 billion in stock buybacks – while doing little to lower the cost of drugs.
Skyrocketing drug prices exact a toll on working and middle class Americans struggling to make ends meet. Last month, Senator Stabenow and several Senate colleagues heard poignant testimony from everyday people affected (and in some cases, devastated) by the sometimes exorbitant cost of crucial medications – including a mother who lost her son to diabetes because he couldn’t afford insulin; an MS patient whose life-saving medication costs some $75,000 per year; and a senior volunteer for the National Committee who said his out-of-pocket costs for prescriptions would have exceeded $5,000 last year were it not for improvements to Medicare in the Affordable Care Act.
The high cost of prescriptions hits older Americans on fixed incomes particularly hard, especially for medications designed to treat serious or chronic conditions where the patient’s cost-share can be expensive. The prices of the 20 brand-name drugs most prescribed to seniors have jumped an average of 12% per year, with some doubling in price. We have all heard of seniors having to choose between prescription drugs and groceries – or rationing doses of critical medications to try to cut costs, an unnecessary and unacceptable situation in one of the wealthiest countries on Earth.
The National Committee endorsed Senator Stabenow’s Know the Lowest Price Act, and supports two other important pieces of legislation she has introduced, including a bill to allow Medicare to negotiate drug prices directly with pharmaceutical companies (the Empowering Medicare Seniors to Negotiate Drug Prices Act), and a bill to permit the importation of drugs from Canada manufactured at facilities inspected by the Food and Drug Administration (the Affordable and Safe Prescription Drug Importation Act). Neither of those bills has come up for a vote in the Senate yet.