Font Size
 
Minimize

    • Share to Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Email
    • Print

Medicare and Means Testing

V I E W P O I N T


  Contributors: ... Medicare

Congressional deliberations about how to address the nation's long-term deficit, as well as how to pay for preventing a reduction in payments to physicians, include proposals for means testing Medicare - that is, requiring higher-income beneficiaries to pay more of Medicare's costs.

Medicare premiums are already income related.  Medicare Part B, which covers physician and outpatient services, has been means tested since 2007 for beneficiaries at the $85,000 and above income level for an individual, and $170,000 and above for a couple. In 2013, higher-income beneficiaries are paying premiums ranging from $146.90 to $335.70 per month, depending on their level of income, compared with the standard premium of $104.90.

Increasing means testing reaches far down into the middle class.  The number of beneficiaries subject to means-tested premiums is expected to increase from 2.4 million in 2011 to 7.8 million in 2019, an increase from 5 percent to 10 percent of Part B enrollees. Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit, is also means tested with the same income thresholds. Extra Part D premiums range from $12.10 to $69.30.

The income thresholds - $85,000/individual and $170,000/couple – are frozen under current law until 2019 when it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of Medicare beneficiaries will be subject to higher premiums.  Studies from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Center for American Progress estimate that applying a higher premium to 10 percent of Medicare beneficiaries today would affect people earning approximately $63,000.

Proposals to expand Medicare means testing include increasing income-related premiums under Medicare Parts B and D until 25 percent of beneficiaries are subject to higher premiums.  A study from the Kaiser Family Foundation found that this would affect individuals with incomes equivalent to $47,000 for an individual and $94,000 for a couple if fully implemented in 2014 – meaning it would reach many middle-income Americans.

Wealthy individuals already pay more.  The Medicare Hospital Insurance (Part A) Trust Fund is financed with payroll taxes of 1.45 percent on employees, matched by employers, with self-employed individuals paying the full 2.9 percent. Since 1994, this payroll tax has been levied on all covered wages and self-employment without a limit. Therefore, the higher an individual's earnings, the more he or she will contribute to Medicare Part A during their working years. In addition, the Part A payroll tax increased in 2013 by an additional 0.9 percent on taxpayers earning above $200,000 for an individual and $250,000 for a couple. These same income thresholds also triggered a 3.8 percent surtax on unearned income, such as interest, dividends and capital gains, which will be applied to Medicare.

 

NATIONAL COMMITTEE POSITION

  • Additional means testing would undermine the social insurance nature of Medicare and ultimately raise costs for middle and lower-income seniors who depend on it.
  • If mean-testing results in Medicare becoming increasingly unfair to higher-income beneficiaries, they may opt out and purchase their own policy on the private market. The departure of higher-income beneficiaries, who tend to be younger and healthier, would increase overall costs and reduce public support for the program.
  • It is also important to keep in mind that over the past decade Medicare spending per enrollee has grown more slowly than private health insurance spending. Medicare’s costs are increasing due to overall health care inflation and the increase in beneficiaries as the baby boomers reach age 65.
  • Proposals which shift costs to beneficiaries, such as means testing and increasing the age of eligibility, create savings for the federal government by shifting costs onto middle-class beneficiaries.  They do nothing to reign in overall health care spending.

We recognize the need to reduce federal health care spending and support proposals, such as building on the cost savings and efficiencies in the Affordable Care Act and requiring rebates for prescription drugs used by individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, which do not shift costs to beneficiaries.

 

Government Relations and Policy, November 2013


Please support our public policy and research

 



Subscribe e-Alerts
Email Address:  
First Name:
Last Name:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

Read Our Blog

New Medicare Advantage Rates Preserve Insurance Industry Subsidies...Again

For the second year in a row, America’s massive health insurance industry lobby launched a Washington lobbying and advertising blitz hoping to scare seniors... ...

Read More

 

Medicare's Top 10
     

 

Copyright © 2014 by NCPSSM
Login  |  Register