|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
V I E W P O I N TRaising Medicare's Eligibility Age: A Costly Benefit Cut for SeniorsMedicare is the principal source of health insurance coverage for nearly 48 million Americans, over 39 million Americans ages 65 and older and 8 million disabled workers who have been receiving Social Security benefits for two years or longer. Medicare is a comprehensive package of health care insurance. Part A of Medicare, which covers hospital insurance, is financed through workers' Social Security tax contributions. Part B, which covers seniors' doctor bills and other out-patient services, and Part D, which provides prescription drug coverage, are financed through monthly premiums paid by beneficiaries and by general revenues. Raising the Age of Eligibility for Medicare For 46 years, since the program's inception in 1965, America 's seniors have been able to count on receiving Medicare when they reach age 65. But now, some in Washington who are looking for ways to reduce federal spending want to make seniors wait for up to two additional years - to age 67 - in order to qualify for Medicare. Raising Medicare's age of eligibility would affect all Americans, including those who are already over the age of 67 who would end up paying higher premiums as a result of the change. Proposals to raise the age of eligibility for Medicare would shift costs to Medicare beneficiaries, employers, and the states. The Kaiser Family Foundation, in a report titled Raising the Age of Medicare Eligibility: A Fresh Look Following Implementation of Health Reform, http://www.kff.org/medicare/8169.cfm and the Center on Budget and Priority Policies, in a recent paper, Raising Medicare's Eligibility Age Would Increase Overall Health Spending and Shift Costs to Seniors, States, and Employers , http://www.cbpp.org/files/8-23-11health.pdf , described who would incur the new health care costs associated with this shift. They are:
Raising the Medicare eligibility age would save the federal government money, but it would increase the cost of health care for everyone else. Certainly, seniors affected by this proposal would pay more for their health care coverage. Employers and anyone else who purchase private sector health insurance would end up paying more for their coverage. In fact, the Kaiser Foundation and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports conclude that the "increased state and private-sector costs would be twice as large as the net federal savings. If the proposal were fully in effect in 2014, Kaiser estimates, it would generate $5.7 billion in net federal savings but $11.4 billion in higher health costs to individuals, employers, and the states."
NATIONAL COMMITTEE POSITION The National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare opposes any and all proposals that would raise the age of eligibility for Medicare.
Government Relations and Policy, September 2011 The National Committee is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the board of directors and professional staff. The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing a secure retirement for all Americans. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||