Font Size

Washington Makes It Clear: Medicare Will Now Be Targeted to Pay Down Deficit

1/2/2013 12:38 PM   By NCPSSM
“Official Washington was in celebration mode on New Year’s Day after kind of averting a completely unnecessary crisis that was entirely of its own creation.”  The Borowitz Report

This was our favorite headline from the hundreds of stories flooding our email boxes during the holiday “fiscal cliff” debate. The fact that it’s satire really doesn’t diminish the underlying message. Crisis creation seems to be what Washington does best these days.  Even so, there was good news in this deal for seniors including: the end of the Social Security payroll tax holiday (which should never have been implemented in the first place), a one year doc fix preventing a massive cut in doctors’ Medicare reimbursements and extension of a number of Medicare programs that would have expired December 31st.

So while America’s seniors can breathe a sigh of relief that Congress finally came to its senses and removed benefit cuts for millions of middle-class and poor Americans from the fiscal cliff deal, that relief will be short-lived. Tomorrow, with the swearing-in of a new Congress, the assault on Social Security and Medicare begins all over again.

As Michael Hiltzik at the Los Angeles Times correctly points out, this alleged quest for deficit reduction has really been about cutting Social Security and Medicare under the guise of debt reduction.

“Despite the lawmakers' claims that the debate has been about closing the federal deficit and reducing the federal debt, none of the negotiating over the past weeks has dealt with those issues. Indeed, the tax and spending package will widen the deficit by some $4 trillion over 10 years, compared with what would happen if the tax increases and spending cuts mandated by existing law were implemented.

The House Republican caucus has consistently looked for ways to protect high-income taxpayers from a tax increase, at the expense of beneficiaries of government programs such as enrollees in Social Security and Medicare. If there's a dominant preoccupation with cutting the deficit lurking somewhere in that mind-set, good luck finding it.”

The Huffington Post describes what’s coming next: 

“The fiscal cliff has not been averted. If anything, the U.S. faces an even more ominous deadline in a few months. The debt ceiling was hit as of New Year's Eve. The U.S. Treasury will dip into its tool bag to keep the country's borrowing ability going, but that will last only about two months. Also in early March, the sequestration -- $110 billion in across-the-board spending cuts, half in defense and half in domestic programs -- springs back, unless Congress finds a way to offset it with other spending cuts. Weeks later, the law that keeps the government funded expires. It all means that, in late February and early March, Congress will face a sequestration, a government default and a government shutdown. Republicans say they'll use the leverage created by the debt ceiling to force Obama to accept spending cuts, particularly in entitlement programs. Obama resisted that notion on Dec. 31, saying he wants more tax increases and won't accept Republican plans to "shove" spending cuts past him. "If they think that's going to be the formula for how we solve this thing, then they've got another thing coming," he said.

However, once the fiscal cliff deal passed, the President’s message changed making it clear cuts to Medicare will be offered up to pay down the deficit:

“I agree with Democrats and Republicans that the aging population and the rising cost of health care makes Medicare the biggest contributor to our deficit. I believe we've got to find ways to reform that program without hurting seniors who count on it to survive. And I believe that there’s further unnecessary spending in government that we can eliminate.” President Obama statement, January 1

There are ways to make Medicare more efficient and save money, in fact, many of those ideas were already implemented in the Affordable Care Act.  Going forward Congress should also consider allowing Medicare to negotiate with drug makers for lower prescription drug costs in Part D and allowing drug re-importation which would save billions in the Medicare program. Unfortunately, both of these common sense proposals are opposed by conservatives, many of the same fiscal hawks, who’d rather reduce spending by cutting benefits instead of curtailing the excessive payments to the highly profitable pharmaceutical industry. 

Winning the fiscal cliff battle is clearly just the first step in ensuring America’s seniors don’t lose the war about to begin in earnest against the nation’s vital safety net programs --Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

 

 

CATEGORY: [Budget], [Medicare], [Social Security]


Comments

Got something to say? Join the discussion »
  1. Tom's avatar Tom said on 1/11/2013 10:38 AM: Reply  
    I agree that Social Security and Medicare expense is not the current budget deficit causation! However, both are in need of restructuring which involves gradually raising eligibility ages from 67 to 70 over many years, starting in 10 years, and raising eligibility ages from 65 to at least 67, over a number of years, starting in 10 years!

    The current assumptions on longevity are way WRONG! The payments will be reduced in 20 years or less for CURRENT as well as FUTURE RETIREES if nothing is done. Acting in 5 or 10 years down the road will require drastic cuts.

    You are doing present and future beneficiaries HARM by fighting current efforts to reform these two critical programs for retirees.

    Thomas P. Ewbank
    Age 69
  2. Wendy's avatar Wendy said on 1/9/2013 3:56 PM: Reply  
    We worked all our lives for the small amount of money Social Security and Medi Care provides for us in retirement. It is not right that the law makers rob the elderly and disabled. They get their huge salaries and use the peoples money for vacations and look at the fact that all presidents get 100% of their salary for a whole life time for serving for as little as four years. This is becoming a third world country where we see whole families starving right here in Ameria today. What is wrong with this picture?
  3. Nell's avatar Nell said on 1/9/2013 12:50 PM: Reply  
    I'm 69yrs old, I would not be able to stay in my home without medicare & SS-- I still have a house pmt. Please don't mess with us old folks' security--
  4. Butch's avatar Butch said on 1/5/2013 11:23 PM: Reply  
    Cutting Social Security or Medicare is a travesty! For those of us who have
    worked over 40 years in this country to see Social Security compared with an
    "entitlement" is obsured. This was a tax and we paid for it. I do not understand
    how we can continue to let illegal aliens into the country and then give them
    the same (or in some cases more)benefits. I have a sister, who is over 66 and is
    disabled, but because she is buying her home, she cannot get any assistance other
    than limited social security. I do not understand how congress thinks. I believe
    they should rely on social security just like we do, then maybe they will understand.
  5. oldmom's avatar oldmom said on 1/5/2013 11:35 AM: Reply  


    Alan Simpson, the Senator from Wyoming calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared "Social Security " to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats. Here's a response in a letter from PATTY MYERS in Montana ... I think she is a little ticked off! She also tells it like it is!

    "Hey Alan, let's get a few things straight!!!
    1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole (tit) for FIFTY YEARS.
    2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 years old. I am now 63).
    3. My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero losers in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would make Bernie Madoff proud.
    4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and "your ilk" pulled the proverbial football away
    from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age, 67. NOW, you and your "shill commission" are proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.
    5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare from Day One, and now "you morons" propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because "you idiots" mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal our money from Medicare to pay the bills.
    6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you "incompetent b-------" spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.
    To add insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "BS" to your incompetence.

    Well, Captain BS, I have a few questions for YOU:

    1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?
    2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?
    3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?
    4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?
    It is you, Captain BS, and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the "greedy" ones. It is you and your fellow nutcase thieves who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers.
    And for what? Votes and your job and retirement security at our expense, you lunk-headed, leech.
    That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic, political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.
    And you can take that to the bank, you miserable S.O.B.. NO, I did not stutter.

    EVERYONE!!
    If you like the way things are in America delete this.
    If you agree with what a Montana citizen, Patty Myers, says, please PASS IT ON!!!!
    P.S. And stop calling Social Security benefits "entitlements". WHAT AN INSULT!!!!
    I have been paying in to the SS system for 45 years “It's my money”-give it back to me the way the system was designed and stop patting yourself on the back like you are being generous by doling out these monthly checks .
  6. Konnie's avatar Konnie said on 1/5/2013 11:24 AM: Reply  
    WHY PICK ON US MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLES, WE NEED ALL THE MONEY WE CAN GET, BECAUSE THEY DON'T LOWER OUR CITY AND COUNTRY TAX, OR OUR INSURANCE THAT WE HAVE TO PAID , ALSO PEOPLES LIVE CLOSE TO THE OCEAN, OR FLOOD AREA HAVE TO HAVE FLOOD INSURANCE, AND ALL THIS ADD UP VERY MUCH AND THE STATES ALWAYS RAISING FEE ON WHAT THEY DO TOO GET MORE MONEY TO RUN THE STATES, OR CITY.

  7. nick's avatar nick said on 1/4/2013 8:49 PM: Reply  
    how come our elected officals have millons for election campaign but not enougn to help out during current crsis. there to busy makinf money lobbing and stuffing there own pockets.quote one movie there to busy kissing babies then stealing there lolypops.
  8. Weaver's avatar Weaver said on 1/4/2013 7:28 PM: Reply  
    Make these scumbags in Congress who want to steal our benefits (SENIORS) retire the same way we do WITHOUT lifetime paid everything for them and their families and without their $100,000 a year pensions and watch them back off! If they had to live a paupers like the rest of us do they'd tell their fat cat donors PACK SAND and pay their fair share!
  9. hi2ya's avatar hi2ya said on 1/4/2013 6:28 PM: Reply  
    The republicans did not hear thre PEOPLE.They voted for OBAMA.His idea's his concerns for the people.The republicans are doing the same as before Obama was elected.Stoping the peoples vote, and restricting the job Obama is trying to do.They are evil to not care for the people.And more evil to stop the help to the people of New Jersey, and New York.Hope the evil ones get what they sew.
  10. Linda's avatar Linda said on 1/4/2013 5:34 PM: Reply  
    Why is it that we never hear Congress talking about making cuts in their own exorbitant benefits and incomes, and their LIFETIME salaries and benefits? Many, many citizens, especially seniors are very concerned about the run-away congressional spending with no limits. How can they cut OUR benefits and not theirs? This should be a cause for lobbying. Have you any answers or solutions to this problem?
    Thanks for your time.
    Linda
  11. roy welsh sr.'s avatar roy welsh sr. said on 1/4/2013 3:27 PM: Reply  
    Since the goverment owes social security 2.7 trillon, how is it ss is a drain. Is it because they have to pay us back for taking our moneys.
  12. roy welsh sr.'s avatar roy welsh sr. said on 1/4/2013 3:24 PM: Reply  
    Since the goverment owes social security 2.7 trillon, how is it ss is a drain. Is it because they have to pay us back for taking our moneys.
  13. Leach46299's avatar Leach46299 said on 1/4/2013 3:18 PM: Reply  
    Here's an idea... If they are hellbent on cutting "entitlements", let them start with their own "entitlements" first. Such as, pay raises, healthcare, life insurance, Free travel and the list goes on and on.
  14. DHFabian's avatar DHFabian said on 1/4/2013 2:45 PM: Reply  
    We go through this quite routinely. Social Security retirement is threatened, and we hear an uproar. While they're roaring, govt quietly cuts away at Social Security disability. As a result of Clinton's cuts (not reversed until Barack Obama became president), the seriously ill and disabled became the fastest-growing group of homeless Americans. America treats its homeless in a brutally primitive manner, and the ill and disabled don't survive very well on the streets.
  15. Nan's avatar Nan said on 1/4/2013 2:37 PM: Reply  
    It is nothing short of vile that our government is looking at programs like this and doing little or nothing to curb our overblown military budget. For shame.
  16. Barbara Gooch's avatar Barbara Gooch said on 1/4/2013 2:36 PM: Reply  
    Why in the world does the Government think they have a right to take the money we have made and use it for their own agenda, we worked for the money it is ours. Make the illigals pay their own way this would help a lot. The turkey's we put in office will not be there again, they have shown how inconpinent they are from the President on down.
  17. Raze's avatar Raze said on 1/3/2013 5:00 PM: Reply  
    We at work would like to KNOW, WHY the ceiling on Social Security is only $113,000, When CEO's are making $500,000 in one week. They should be held accountable each month for that limit.
    The House, Senate should be paying likewise if they're in there and retire after six months. The GOVERNMENT is fixing it for themselves and You and I can't do anything for two to four years to get them out , and still we get the shaft. GET BIG BUSINESS OUT of Government........
  18. SJN's avatar SJN said on 1/3/2013 11:16 AM: Reply  
    Instead of cutting, why not raise the payroll limit??? People are already use to paying it and probably do not base their annual budgets based on not paying the SS payroll tax. I also believe this will make younger people feel like they may end up gaining something form the system when they retire after all.

    I have no problem with the SS payroll tax and it should have never been part of Obama's so called failed "Stimulus" but the money needs to be put into the SS Trust Fund not in the Washington's spending account. We do not more IOU's put into the Trust Fund we want real dollars that can secure the system and earn gains that will help provide the funding for current and future generations.

Post A Comment

 [Quick Submit with Ctrl+Enter]

Remember my details
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Get the Latest

Indicates required fields


Questions?

Have a Social Security or Medicare question?


 

 

Media Contacts

Pamela Causey
Communications Director
Causeyp@ncpssm.org(202) 216-8378
(202) 236-2123 cell

Kim Wright
Assistant Director of Communications
Wrightk@ncpssm.org
(202) 216-8414

Entitled to Know

     

 

Copyright © 2012 by NCPSSM
Login  |