Font Size

29 Senators Say No Cuts to Social Security Benefits – What About the Others?

9/21/2012 12:19 PM   By NCPSSM

Senator Bernie Sanders has circulated a dear colleague letter in the Senate declaring that Social Security benefit cuts should NOT be a part of any deficit so-called “Grand Bargain” destined to be the focal-point of this fall’s lame duck Congressional session.  Sen. Sanders is the founder of the Senate’s Defending Social Security Caucus, and organized this effort with the help of Senators Begich(D-AK), Franken(D-MN) and Whitehouse (D-RI).  The letter, signed by 29 Democratic Senators, says:

“Contrary to some claims, Social Security is not the cause of our nation’s deficit problem.  Not only does the program operate independently, but it is prohibited from borrowing.  Social Security must pay all benefits from its own trust fund.  If there are insufficient funds to pay out full benefits, benefits are automatically reduced to the level supported by the program’s own revenues.  Social Security cannot drive up the deficit by tapping general revenues to pay benefits. To be sure, Social Security has its own long-term challenges that will need to be addressed in the decades ahead. But the budget and Social Security are separate, and should be considered separately."

The vast majority of American’s couldn’t agree more.  However, we have to wonder why only 29 signatures on this letter?  Where are the others

So who didn’t sign? Max Baucus, Michael Bennet, Jeff Bingaman, Tom Carper, Bob Casey, Kent Conrad, Chris Coons, Dick Durbin, Dianne Feinstein, Kay Hagan, John Kerry, Amy Klobuchar, Herb Kohl, Mary Landrieu, Joe Lieberman, Claire McCaskill, Ben Nelson, Bill Nelson, Mark Pryor, Jeanne Shaheen, Jon Tester, Mark Udall, Mark Warner, Jim Webb.

A number of these members are retiring so it’s also important to factor in their replacements and where these new Senators stand on cutting Social Security benefits to reduce the deficit.  We recommend you read David Dayen’s breakdown of some of the other missing signees and what it could mean for Social Security. 

CATEGORY: [Budget], [Social Security]


Comments

Got something to say? Join the discussion »
  1. Marcie's avatar Marcie said on 9/24/2012 6:02 PM: Reply  
    The last time I heard, if you borrow money you are obligated to pay it back. OR ELSE. I think that the government should pay us back OUR money that they took from us, and there would be no need to make alterations to our benefits. Social Security benefits is the only income that many people have, and yet the government wants to take more away. Which goes to prove that the RICH don't know what POOR is. They only talk like they do. What a shame, that the most wonderful country in the world is becoming a laughing stalk of the world. The rest of the world treats it's elderly with respect and compassion.
  2. Gerry's avatar Gerry said on 9/22/2012 12:14 AM: Reply  

    I think you should post this on your website.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wendell-potter/are-seniors-paying-attent_b_850438.html
  3. Jeanne's avatar Jeanne said on 9/21/2012 1:52 PM: Reply  
    Where would we be without Sen Sanders? I suppose all the Senators who aren't on this letter want to cut Social Security and for that,they should be tossed out on their ear. America's voters had better take note.

Post A Comment

 [Quick Submit with Ctrl+Enter]

Remember my details
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Get the Latest

Indicates required fields


Questions?

Have a Social Security or Medicare question?


 

 

Media Contacts

Pamela Causey
Communications Director
Causeyp@ncpssm.org(202) 216-8378
(202) 236-2123 cell

Kim Wright
Assistant Director of Communications
Wrightk@ncpssm.org
(202) 216-8414

Entitled to Know

     

 

Copyright © 2012 by NCPSSM
Login  |